Let’s talk about air quality data! Join us for Open Call on this topic every Tuesday until Dec. 14. Click here for details!

Public Lab Research note

This is an attempt to replicate an activity.

Creating Public Lab's Logic Model

by liz | October 04, 2018 20:54 04 Oct 20:54 | #17226 | #17226

The University of California Davis Center for Citizen and Community Science worked with the staff of Public Lab to create a Logic Model that we could use in evaluating our impact. Here it is, both the direct link, and as an image:

image description

Let's take closer look

Clearly, there's a lot of densely packed information in here. Let's explore column by column; I created a graphic to illustrate each column followed by plain text:


image description Financial Capital

  • Grants
  • Corporate sponsorships
  • Individual contributions
  • Kits sales
  • Fiscal sponsorships

Human Capital:

  • Community members
  • Organizers
  • Board of directors
  • Employees
  • Funding Partners
  • Advisors (Pro bono, et al)
  • Institutional Partners
  • Organizational Partners
  • Collaborating individuals •Collaborating individuals who are also part of other orgs / agencies / institutions / firms
  • Communities of shared interest
  • Place-based communities
  • Coalitions, Networks, Movements

Material Capital:

  • In kind equipment
  • In kind supplies
  • In kind physical spaces
  • Free & open source resources (code, designs, publications)

Outputs - activities

image description

  • The Public Lab community (PL) convenes and maintains welcoming and respectful in-person and online spaces through the upholding of a Code of Conduct, anchored by the non-profit

  • PL community exchanges, asks for, and contributes resources, strategies, supporting materials, and processes for achieving the mission -- including organizing, policy analysis, development of accessible data collection and handling methods, design and distribution of accessible hardware kits -- and supports their use

  • PL staff host, maintain, and refine -- with community contribution -- collaboration platforms & processes to promote exchanges, requests, and contributions online and through printed materials

  • PL organizers add structure to collaborative efforts through facilitating, project managing, matchmaking, and onboarding

  • Public Lab broadly cultivates institutional & organizational partnerships, and participates in coalitions, networks, and movements

Outputs - participation

image description

  • Overview: the described Outputs and Outcomes happen across, among, and beyond the Public Lab community, with the non-profit staff providing a backstop of responsibility and focus on the mission. Refer to Org Chart.

  • Public Lab community is broadly defined as anyone interacting with the Public Lab ecosystem

  • Public Lab organizers are broadly defined as anyone, including staff, who picks up facilitation, project management, matchmaking, or onboarding work

  • Public Lab staff are employees of the US-incorporated 501(c)3 non-profit

  • Partners & collaborators may include individuals, communities of shared interest, place-based communities, non-profit organizations, civil servants and government agencies, elected officials at any level of government, academic institutions, firms, among others

  • Coalitions, networks, and movements are assemblages working toward aligned goals

Outcomes - short term

These short-term outcomes are numbered for ease of reference, and the image contains abbreviated text to make these faster to comprehend by new readers:

image description

  • 1 - Resources are available to do environmental data and information gathering at quality levels relevant for organizing and advocacy (Kits Initiative)

  • 2 - Local data collection projects contribute perspectives on environmental concerns and galvanize community organization

  • 3 - PL community members exchange stories, resources, methods, equipment, and strategies across lived experiences, domains of expertise, and networks

  • 4 - PL community activity and interaction increases in quality and quantity, particularly dialogue

  • 5 - PL community members learn concepts, attitudes, and skills, as well as benefit from interacting in Public Lab

  • 6 - PL maintains existing and develops new institutional & organizational partnerships, and continues and expands participation in coalitions, networks, and movements

Outcomes - medium term

image description

  • PL community members advocate for locally determined goals, projects, and needs through data and community organizing

  • Community projects gain exposure and problem solving capacity; Initiation of projects increases

  • PL community members develop methods and materials for public use, and others use these tools and materials for their own projects

  • PL community members take ownership of scientific knowledge generation and sharing

  • Organizational partnerships are strong, sustained, and provide the basis for a larger, well-connected network

  • Government, academia, professional associations, and civil society respect and have positive perceptions of different kinds of local knowledge and expertise

Outcomes - long term

image description

  • The public has greater capacity to monitor, understand, and critique existing decision-making through data that strengthens accountability

  • The public’s improved collaboration skills in addressing complex, systemic issues lead to improved, more equitable governance, reducing injustice

  • Community science, and free & open source projects are promoting justice and equity

  • Community science, and free & open source practices are prevalent in environmental monitoring projects

  • Open licensing and publishing is built into all publicly funded research and development for environmental monitoring

  • There is political will for the public sector to maintain its responsibility for ensuring equitable environmental health through science-based policy


Login to comment.